[ad_1]
threadsMeta may have a Twitter-like service and competitor to X distancing themselves from politics, but that doesn’t mean it won’t try to tackle misinformation spreading on social media – especially ahead of national elections. next the user reports Following the fact-checking seen on the network, the company confirmed that it has engaged with fact-checking organizations to address misinformation circulating on Threads, but has yet to fully fact-check Threads content. Has not started since.
Meta had announced in december that it will happen in early 2024 fact-checking partner Will be able to review and rate false content directly on threads. Meanwhile, Meta was only able to match existing fact-checks to “nearly identical content on threads”. From looking at users’ reports of fact-checking appearing on threads now, this is a case match Ratings, not threads, are the more anticipated direct fact-checking of content that people are watching.
The company confirmed the matter, telling TechCrunch that it has not yet finalized the ability for fact-checkers to rate content directly on threads, but will do so soon.
Posted by @culturecrave
look at threads
threads user I noticed warning labels appear on posts – In one case, as an interstitial over a false AI-generated video and as a pop-up visible from the bottom of the screen.
The warning message reads “False information”, followed by an explanation that “the same false information was reviewed by fact-checkers in another thread. There may be minor differences.” It then also noted that “Independent fact-checkers say this information has no basis in fact,” and documents which fact-checking sources reached this conclusion.
Below this, users can read the names of fact-checking organizations and the sources’ conclusions – such as “false” – as well as additional information about the content and why it is false.
Image Credit: threads screenshot
An example of this fact-checking might be Seen on threads here, It pertains to a video that was circulating in a Telegram chat, which is claimed to be from a France 24 broadcast. However, the video was never broadcast or even created – it was AI-generated, fact-checked by the organization Both State,
In our tests, Fact-Check initially hid the Threads post with the video, but offered a “View Post” button to click and view it. You can optionally tap “See why” if you want to know why it’s being hidden for incorrect information. However, the feature seems a bit underdeveloped, as links to fact-checking websites only work on mobile, not desktop, and the informational warning below the video, once viewed, was in small text that was easily missed. could go.
Image Credit: threads screenshot
Although full fact-checking capabilities have not yet become available in Threads, when they do the feature will differentiate Threads from its rival X, where fact-checking is now largely managed through crowdsourcing. With community notes from X (originally called birdwatch When the company was known as Twitter), independent volunteers fact-check posts and add additional context or corrections. The system’s algorithm then attempts to find consensus among people who do not typically share the same views. If both parties agree that fact checking is necessary, the community note goes live. Meanwhile, the X team can’t edit or modify notes The company’s website states, Instead, X only takes action on posts that violate its terms, conditions, or privacy policy.
Elon Musk has since supported the use of Community Notes get The company is due to be established in 2022. It is believed that Twitter’s former team was guilty of leftist bias and censorship. However, Found a ProPublica report Community notes have not yet grown large enough to address the misinformation circulating on X regarding the Israel-Hamas war. What’s more, debunked claims were often spread by verified accounts with blue checks, giving them greater visibility, it said.
Meta is clearly taking a more cautious approach to news and the potential for misinformation.
Instagram head Adam Mosseri said this last year Threads will not “promote news” on its platform, upsetting journalists and news consumers who were looking for a Twitter alternative. The company also kept its promises last week when it announced that it would No longer actively includes political content in its recommendations Both on threads and on Instagram. News and politics can still be seen New trend feature of the appHowever, “Today’s Topics”.
[ad_2]
Thanks For Reading