[ad_1]
He cited Ramdhari Singh Dinkar’s poem ‘Krishna Ki Chetavani’ from his book ‘Rashmirathi’ to underline his view on what could be the first case of a prominent BJP leader claiming Kashi and Mathura, some just days after a Varanasi court allowed the puja. in a cave in Gyanvapi Masjid and in an RTI response, the ASI said that the Keshavdev temple in Mathura was demolished for the construction of Mughal King Aurangzeb’s mosque.
“An injustice has been done to Ayodhya. When I talk about injustice, we remember something that happened 5,000 years ago. Lord Krishna asked for half of the kingdom of the Kauravas and said that if this was difficult, so give only five villages to the Pandavas. He spoke of “Five villages. But here the request is only for three places which are the centers of our faith,” he said.
“Society, faith, for many years, only speaks of three”, Yogi continued. “Only three because they are special places. They are not normal, they are the places where the gods incarnated,” he added, stressing the importance of resolving long-standing conflicts in Kashi and Mathura. “Duryodhana wo bhi de na saka, ashish samaj ke le na saka. Ulte Hari ko bandhe chala, jo tha asadhya, saadhne chala,” he later recited in ‘Rashmirathi’, adding that Duryodhan couldn’t even give five villages and that its rigidity led to Mahabharat. “Here too there is rigidity and when rigidity is mixed with politics and efforts are made to turn it into vote bank politics, then conflicts arise,” Yogi said.
“India will only accept the principles of Ram Rajya, not Company‘
We see for the first time that the common faith is not respected and that the majority population pleads,” said Yogi. “We only asked for three placesand there was no problem with other places,” Yogi said.
Then, in an obvious reference to a recent court order allowing puja at Gyanvapi cave in Varanasi, he said: “When people saw the festivities in Ayodhya (on January 22), Nandi Baba (the Lord’s helper Shiva) also said why should he wait. and the barricades were removed overnight.Aur hamare Krishna Kanhaiya kahan manane wale hain (Why will Krishna Kanhaiyya give in?).
Responding to the governor’s speech in the budget session, the CM said, “Everyone in the country is happy that Lord Ram has been installed in the temple (in Ayodhya). This is the first time in the world that Lord Ram himself had to produce proof of his existence. But it teaches us perseverance. We were happy not only because Lord Ram found his place but also because we kept our words. Mandir wahin banaya.
Yogi said the country is no longer ready to sing hymns to looters. “Even in the times of Mahabharata, Duryodhan had said that he would not give land even equal to the size of a needle. What happened next, the Kauravs were wiped out, it must be remembered “, said Yogi and added that the wait of centuries in Ayodhya is now over.
He criticized the opposition, particularly the Samajwadi Party and its leader Akhilesh Yadav, for their stance against the Ram temple, highlighting the historical significance of January 22 as a pivotal day for India and the world.
Highlighting the “injustices endured by Ayodhya during previous administrations”, the CM compared the city’s plight to the struggles described in ancient scriptures. “We agree that the temple dispute was taken up in court, but the roads could have been widened. The ‘Ghats’ could have been restored there. Electricity could have been provided. Sanitation arrangements could have been made. “Better sanitation facilities could have been provided. An airport could have been built,” he said.
“In Ayodhya, a kitchen and a night shelter in the name of Mata Shabri and Nishadraj respectively have been opened. Aren’t the followers of Mata Shabri and Nishadraj part of the PDA (a term coined by the SP leader for ‘pichhda ( upside down), Dalit and Alpsankhyak (minority’),” Yogi asked, adding, “Deputy CM (Brajesh Pathak) rightly said that PDA means ‘pariwar development authority’.”
Citing Governor Anandi Ben Patel’s speech that the country was seeing the principles of Rama Rjya taking shape, he said, “I will strongly say that the country will only accept the principles of Ram Rajya, not those of samajwad (socialism). We should be proud of our heritage… samajwad is now a mirage. The Samajwad that you have conceptualized has become unnatural and impractical. The state even suffered from family socialism,” Yogi concluded.
[ad_2]